| The VP-IIM has significant
advantages over the existing biometrics security
systems when evaluated against the above factors. |
| 1.
Usability |
| i |
Ultimate system Usability of 99.98%
which means almost of all general population can
use the system without any problems. |
| 2. System Performance |
| i |
The false acceptance rate (FAR) and false rejection
rate (FRR) are 0.0001% and 0.1%, respectively. |
| ii |
Verification Speed: 0.4 sec/person
Enrolment Speed: 0.4 sec/person (twice)
|
| 3. User convenience |
| i |
No direct contact with vein for authentication
and therefore ease of mind in use. |
| ii |
It is hygienic because minimal physical contact
is required. |
| iii |
Since it involves the back of the hand, there
is minimal positioning and inconvenience issues. |
| 4. Reliability
of hardware |
| i |
Reliable performance in poor environmental conditions
like contamination / humidity. |
| ii |
Robust physical feature makes it more resistant
to damages and wear and tear |
| 5. Costs |
| i |
Very comparative costs for a high-end biometrics
system. Although more expensive than most fingerprint
readers, it is more affordable than iris/retina
scan systems. |
| 6. Ease of use |
| i |
Friendly user interface and management |
| ii |
Excellent performance in network environment |
| iii |
Ease of setup and maintenance |
| 7. Security (prevents
duplication) |
| i |
The sensor of VP-II does not require physical
contact, so it prevents enrolment of non-biometric
patterns and fraudulent use of biometrics features
(like system-residual biometrics patterns). |
| ii |
Increased security because blood has to circulate
in a vein and therefore it is impossible to duplicate. |
| iii |
VP-II systems store user's vascular data in hardware
after encryption. |